Export Controls and Technology Transfers in a Global Economy

How to keep critical information and technology away from those who wish to harm our country, our families, and ourselves.

By Mark D. Harris[1]

The MDHI’s work in Ukraine and the Middle East has stimulated discussion on bringing technology into these countries, which could be considered de facto technology transfers. For example, we have asked if it is permissible to bring new ultrasound machines into Ukraine to take care of patients. The answer that we discovered was a qualified “yes”, if we were willing to cut through thickets of red tape and wade through rivers of regulations. Ultrasound machines are not “prohibited/restricted”, and they are not “dual use” (military and civilian), but they are “high technology” and therefore subject to scrutiny. There have also been questions about robotics parts and 3D printers, both of which can be considered “dual use”

In an era of rapid innovation and global collaboration, the protection of sensitive technology is no longer just a matter of corporate security; it is a critical component of national security and international law. For organizations operating across borders, understanding the intricacies of export controls is essential to avoid severe legal penalties and reputational damage.

Export Control Obligations and Technology Transfers

A technology transfer occurs whenever controlled technical data is shared with a foreign person, whether through email, cloud access, visual inspection of equipment, verbal briefings, or something else.[2] Organizations must identify the Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) for their technologies to determine if a license is required before any transfer takes place.[3] Failure to secure the necessary authorizations can lead to massive fines, the loss of export privileges, and even criminal prosecution.

Export Control Classification Numbers (ECCN)

  • First digit – category, such as electronics or materials
  • Second digit – product group, such as software or hardware
  • Final three digits – unique identifier

The special designator, EAR99, applies to items not specifically listed on the Commerce Control List (CCL), which is maintained by the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS). The ECCN helps exporters:

  • Identify whether an item is controlled for export.
  • Determine the reason for control, such as national security, anti-terrorism, or nuclear nonproliferation
  • Check if a license is required for a specific country or end user.
  • Identify available license exceptions that may allow export without a license

People can find ECCNs from manufacturers and from the CCL.

Best Practices for Safeguarding Sensitive Technologies

Safeguarding sensitive technology requires a defense-in-depth strategy that combines physical, digital, and procedural controls. Organizations should adopt a principle of least privilege, ensuring that only individuals with a verified “need to know” and the appropriate legal authorization can access controlled data.[4] Key measures include:

  • Digital Segmentation: Maintaining controlled technical data on secure, encrypted servers with multi-factor authentication and robust activity logging
  • Physical Security: Using badges, biometric scanners, and restricted areas to prevent unauthorized visual access to prototypes or sensitive hardware
  • Marking and Labeling: Clearly marking all documents and files containing controlled technology with their specific classification and handling instructions
  • Secure Communications: Mandating the use of approved, encrypted platforms for any discussions involving sensitive technical details

Elements of an Effective Internal Compliance Program (ICP)

An Internal Compliance Program (ICP) is the foundational framework that ensures an organization meets its legal obligations consistently. A robust ICP is not a static document but a living system of oversight and improvement. The essential elements of an ICP in a corporate environment include:

  • Management Commitment: Clear, written support from senior leadership prioritizing compliance over short-term commercial gains. For example, management at all levels must commit to full compliance with laws such as the Arms Export Control Act (AECA)[5] and International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR).[6]
  • Continuous Training: Regularly updated training programs tailored to different roles, from engineers and sales teams to IT and HR.
  • Risk Assessment: Ongoing evaluation of the organization’s products, customers, and geographic reach to identify and mitigate potential compliance gaps
  • Recordkeeping: Maintaining meticulous records of all export classifications, licenses, and communications for at least five years
  • Auditing and Reporting: Internal and external audits to verify that procedures are being followed, coupled with a clear mechanism for reporting and correcting violations

Academic institutions and even individuals must consider whether their actions violate law. For example, in July 2009, a professor at the University of Tennessee working on an Air Force contract was convicted of violating the AECA by sharing technical data with Chinese and Iranian graduate students. He served over two years in prison.

Due Diligence for International Partnerships and Investment

International partnerships, mergers, and acquisitions present significant export control risks. Before entering into an agreement, organizations must perform rigorous due diligence to ensure they are not inadvertently facilitating illegal technology transfers.

This process begins with Restricted Party Screening (RPS). Organizations must vet all potential partners, investors, and vendors against government “watchlists,” such as the Entity List or the Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List. Beyond basic screening, firms must investigate the end-use and end-user of their technology. If a prospective partner has ties to a restricted military program or a sanctioned government, the risk may be prohibitive. Furthermore, foreign investments in sensitive domestic technology sectors may trigger a review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), which has the power to block or unwind deals that threaten national security.

Conclusion

In summary, the intersection of technology and international law requires a proactive and disciplined approach. By integrating robust compliance programs and rigorous due diligence into their core operations, organizations can innovate with confidence, knowing they are protecting both their assets and the security of the global community

Footnotes

[1] Augmented by artificial intelligence

[2] A deemed export is the sharing or release of controlled technology, technical data, or source code to a foreign national within the United States, which is considered an export to the foreign person’s country of nationality or permanent residency, even though no physical item crosses borders

[3] An ECCN is a five-character alphanumeric code used to classify U.S. export-controlled items on the Commerce Control List (CCL) to determine licensing requirements.

[4] The principle of least privilege (PoLP) ensures that users, processes, or applications are granted only the minimum access necessary to perform their tasks, reducing security risks and limiting potential damage from breaches. It is also known as the Principle of Minimal Privilege (PoMP) or the Principle of Least Authority (PoLA).

[5] Provisions of the AECA:

  • Foreign Military Sales (FMS) and Commercial Sales: AECA provides the framework for both government-to-government and commercial defense transactions
  • End-Use Monitoring: Ensures that exported defense articles are used as intended and not diverted to unauthorized users
  • Restrictions on Certain Countries: Prohibits sales to nations supporting terrorism or not cooperating with U.S. antiterrorism efforts
  • Congressional Oversight: Requires reports and certifications to Congress on significant arms sales and potential violations
  • Licensing and Compliance: U.S. exporters must obtain licenses for defense articles and services, with strict documentation and adherence to AECA regulations

[6] International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) is a is a set of U.S. Department of State regulations controlling the export and import of defense-related articles, services, and technical data to safeguard national security and enforce foreign policy objectives. ITAR covers defense articles (guns, bombs, US munitions list), defense services, and technical data.

Saratoga Campaign 1777

The Battle of Saratoga was a turning point in the American Revolution. Leaders like John Burgoyne, Horatio Gates, and Benedict Arnold, with thousands of valiant men, fought in a drama that would change the world.

By Mark D. Harris, MD, MPH, MBA, MDiv, ThM, PhD, DBA

Background: The Road to Saratoga

After fighting side by side to defeat the French and Indians (1756-1763), Britain and her American colonies drifted apart. Laboring under a heavy debt, Parliament increased taxation and control over the Americans. The Quebec Act (1774) was intended to build support for Britain among the Catholic French Canadians, institute the French system of civil law,[1] and limit colonial migration into the Ohio Valley. However, it infuriated English colonists. But it, and other “intolerable acts,” provided the tipping point into revolution.

Before Congress even declared America to be a new nation (4 July 1776), American rebels captured Fort Ticonderoga (10 May 1775), Crown Point, Fort St. Johns (17 Sep to 3 Nov 1775), and Montreal in the early months of the conflict. US General Richard Montgomery commanded about 1000 militia through the St. Lawrence River north to Quebec. Moving primarily by water, they brought most of the artillery and supplies. US General Benedict Arnold began taking about 1000 militia through the wilderness of Maine, from the Kennebec River to the Chaudière River. Having started in July, Arnold’s force lost about 500 men to starvation, desertion, expiring enlistments, and disease (smallpox). Montgomery’s force diminished to 700 by expiring enlistments.

Continue reading “Saratoga Campaign 1777”

The Battle of Tarawa: America’s Early Lesson in WWII Amphibious Warfare

By Mark D. Harris, MD, MPH, MBA, MDiv, ThM, PhD, DBA

What was the Battle of Tarawa in World War II? Why was it important then,…and today?

The morning of November 20, 1943, dawned over a small coral atoll in the Central Pacific that few Americans had ever heard of. Within seventy-six hours, Tarawa would become seared into the American consciousness as one of the most savage battles of World War II. The ferocious fighting on this tiny strip of land, barely twelve square miles in total area, would claim over 6,000 lives and fundamentally transform how the United States Navy and Marine Corps conducted amphibious operations for the remainder of the war.

Continue reading “The Battle of Tarawa: America’s Early Lesson in WWII Amphibious Warfare”

Defending Taiwan

The world in 2025 is a bigger geopolitical mess than it was in 1914. Taiwan, Ukraine, and Israel are developed states at the epicenter of life-or-death struggles.[1] After a recent visit to Taiwan, this article describes a way, and quite probably the only way, for Taiwan to survive as an independent nation if China invades.

By Mark D. Harris, MD, MPH, MBA, MDiv, ThM, PhD, DBA

Chiang Kai Shek (1887-1975) fled mainland China and moved his nationalists, the Kuomintang (KMT), to Taiwan after their defeat by the communists under Mao Tse Dung (1893-1976) in 1949. Since that year, the Communists ruling mainland China have declared that Taiwan is a renegade province and they will take it back by any means possible, including war.[2]  Every modern Chinese ruler, including the current autocrat Xi Jin Ping, has reaffirmed this intention.[3]

A pre-invasion scenario

Chinese paramilitary “fishing boats”, coast guard ships, and naval vessels encircle Taiwan under the guise of military exercises, law enforcement, or humanitarian actions. These boats partially disrupt Taiwanese imports and exports. Then they leave, having learned valuable lessons and helped lull Taiwanese defenders and politicians into a sleepy acquiescence, like a frog in warming water. Chinese aircraft from bases such as Longtian (in Fujian) harass Taiwanese responding forces. Cyber attackers, space forces, special forces, and others engage. Much of this is happening today. By not firing the first shot, the Chinese undercut nations that may oppose them. If no one physically challenged the blockade, Taiwan would slowly be strangled to death.

Continue reading “Defending Taiwan”

Avoiding Putin’s Trap

President-elect Donald Trump has vowed to stop the Russian war on Ukraine. While he possesses a strong personality, Trump’s personality alone is not likely to stop the T-80s from rolling into Dnipro and Zaporizhzhia. Stopping the war is a worthy goal, but Trump and his team need to ensure that they do not lose the peace. The following article illuminates how to get a fair deal.

By Mark D. Harris, MD, MPH, MBA, MDiv, ThM, PhD, DBA

Background

Ukraine is renowned for its fertile, black soil, and Ukrainian agriculture ranks among the most productive in the world. Fifty-five percent of Ukraine’s land is arable, mostly in the western and central regions, and 14% of Ukrainians work in agriculture.[1] Equally important, Ukraine has historically had several excellent ports on the Black Sea to safely and cheaply get its crops to market. These ports include Odessa, Chernomorsk, Yuzhny, Berdyansk, Mariupol, and Sevastopol.

Situated to the north and east, Russia lacks Ukraine’s vast swathes of rich farmland. For centuries, Russians moving to Ukraine to find a better life had few opportunities to settle in the western and central regions since native Ukrainians were there. The Donetsk and Luhansk regions along the Dnieper River in the east lacked such productive soil but, as the Industrial Revolution began in the 19th century, these regions had something even more valuable. Eastern Ukraine is flush with coal and iron and has a major river to move the coal and iron to market. In the late 19th and early to mid-20th centuries, Russian settlers flocked to these regions, together known as the Donbas. Nationwide, Ukrainians account for 77.8% of the people in the Ukraine and Russians account for 17.3%, but the Russian population percentage is much higher in the Donbas and in the Crimean Peninsula.[2]

Prelude to War

Putin had what he considered to be good reasons to attack Ukraine. He argued that the West had invaded Russia six times in the past two centuries, while Russia had not initiated hostilities against the West.[3] He cited NATO encroachment as a threat to Russia. Putin styled himself as a modern Russian savior along the lines of Peter the Great.

Continue reading “Avoiding Putin’s Trap”

Arab-Israeli Conflict

On 7 October 2023, the Palestinian Arab terror group Hamas suddenly attacked Israel, killing over 1400. In the succeeding two months, more than 10,000 Palestinians in the Gaza Strip have been killed. This article, part of a lecture series called the Bible and the News, answers the questions: What is the situation? How did we get here? What does the Bible say? What do we do about it?

By Mark D. Harris, MD, MPH, MBA, MDiv, ThM, PhD, DBA

What is the situation?

Jews and Palestinian Arabs claim the same land as their homeland, the area known as Palestine. 25 April 2023 was the 75th anniversary of the founding of Israel. 7 Oct 2023 was the fiftieth anniversary of the Yom Kippur War, the Arab states’ most successful war against Israel.

The Israeli claim to the land. God gave Abraham and his descendants the Promised Land. The granted land includes Canaan, part of Transjordan and much of modern Syria. The promise is far larger than modern Israel.

  • Bible testimony
    • Genesis 12:1-3, 7 – God promises to make Abram into a great nation.
    • Genesis 15:18-21 – God promises give Abram a son, make him a great people, and give him the land of Canaan.
    • Genesis 26:3 – God repeats His promises to Isaac, Abraham’s son.
    • Genesis 28:13-15 – God repeats His promises to Jacob, Abraham’s grandson.
    • Exodus 23:30-33 – God repeats His promises to the Hebrew nation.
    • Numbers 34:1-12 – God promises specific areas in Canaan to the twelve Hebrew tribes who came out of Egypt.
  • Historically, the Hebrews only comprised a majority in Canaan from roughly 1400 BC to 586 BC, 800 years. Jews did not live in the land in large numbers from AD 135 to about 1940, over 1800 years.
  • The Hebrew Temple Mount and much of Hebrew religious history is in Palestine.

Continue reading “Arab-Israeli Conflict”